Wine Reviews

Ratings Explained

84 & Below – Not Posted ‘cause we won’t drink it
85 + A good wine. Buy if the price is right
90 + A very good wine, in our humble opinion
95 + An awe inspiring wine – Possibly life altering

All wine reviews are based solely on the personal tastes of the authors.
Disclosure: Samples are designated by an “S” beside the wine reviewed.
We’re still objective. Robert Parker doesn’t buy his wines either

Nov 022010
 
2007 – Santa Barbara, CA  $18 Rating 3.50

Tempranillo has been described as the “perfect blend of Cabernet and Pinot Noir.” C3, in my opinion, leans closer to Pinot. It has a dry clean fruity flavor with barely a hint of the earthiness often found in its Spanish counterparts.

Nov 022010
 
2005 – Napa Valley, CA  $35 — Rating 90

Expect to pick flavors of raspberry, blackberry cassis, dark chocolate and vanilla among others. The tannins blend well with the fruit to create a very long finish. Drink this wine slowly so you can really appreciate its layered complexity.

Nov 022010
 
2006 – Anderson Valley, CA $60 — Rating 91

Wowser is it good! Wine Spectator gave this wine 90 and Wine Enthusiast gave it a 91, well-deserved scores. A full bodied Pinot with a velvety texture with big tannins that balance the bold fruit.

Oct 302010
 
2008 – Carneros – Napa Valley, CA – $50 — Rating 86

Winemaker notes: Our 2008 Pinot Nero is full of ripe cherry and cranberry aromas with overtones of spice, rose petals and wood smoke. Flavors are bright at entry, deepening to a lush vanilla-tinged mid-palate and lingering through the silky finish.